Lege Artis Medicinae

[Crucial points in the therapy of hepatitis C]

MAKARA Mihály, HUNYADY Béla

MARCH 20, 2014

Lege Artis Medicinae - 2014;24(03)

[The first generation of direct acting antivirals represented a milestone in the therapy of hepatitis C but other breakthroughs are on the way with imminent authorization of new antiviral drugs and interferon-free combinations. The prices of these new agents necessitate the rational use of limited financial capacities: relatively cheaper interferon-based treatments could be used first for those who can be cured with these combinations, while the most expensive treatments are to be reserved for those with no other options. In the future, interferonfree regimens will likely be used first in those patients who did not respond to firstgeneration interferon-based regimens and in whom interferon therapy is contraindicated. To avoid complications of the disease, currently it is reasonable to treat all eligible patients with advanced fibrosis, particularly those with compensated cirrhosis, with interferon-based treatments. In some instances other medical or social conditions warrant prompt treatment. The triage of treatments is based on the Priority Index in Hungary. Current triple therapies with protease inhibitors are complicated by drug and food interactions as well as by frequent (sometimes severe) side effects. General practitioners and other specialists need to be involved in managing these issues. It is of utmost importance to refer patients to hepatology care before decompensation or development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The key of timely and accurate diagnosis is organized anti-HCV screening in populations at risk and in the age group with the highest prevalence.]

COMMENTS

0 comments

Related contents

LAM Extra for General Practicioners

[Treatment of hepatits C virus infected patients with cirrhosis in real-life conditions in Hungary with the two pegylated interferons]

[AIMS - In this trial we have analyzed the data of cirrhotic naiv as well as treatment experienced patients with chronic hepatitis C, treated in the East-Hungarian hepatology centers, between 2004 and 2010, because in the era of triple combinations, we mostly treat cirrhotic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS - We have found 272 patients and in most of them the cirrhosis was proven by biopsy. These patients were treated with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) alpha plus ribavirin in combination, 172 were naiv and 100 patients were treatment experienced. Data were collected retrospectively and the pretreatment parameters like age, sex, body weight, transaminase level, genotype, initial viral load, comorbidities, and proportion of first and repeated treatments have been analyzed. We have investigated the influence of the initial parameters as well as the type of pegIFN on the complete early virologic response (cEVR) and on the sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS - The cEVR was 27% (74/272) and the SVR was 21% (58/272) in the whole patient population. With pegIFN a-2a, 32% (45/141) cEVR and 28% (39/141) SVR, whereas with pegIFN a-2b 22% (29/131) cEVR and 15% (19/131) SVR were achieved. Among this patient population the largest subgroup was the naiv patients with high viral load (HVL). In this subgroup the SVR was 21% (28/132). However, with pegIFN a-2a SVR was 29% (21/73), whereas with pegIFN a-2b SVR was only 12% (7/59). The above differences found between the two pegIFNs proved to be statistically significant. Age <40 years, low viral load (LVL) and treatment with pegIFN a-2a proved to be independent positive factors influencing cEVR as well as SVR, by multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION - According to these results, cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C may benefit if pegIFN a-2a is used as backbone therapy in triple combinations. ]

Lege Artis Medicinae

[The role of hepatitis C virus in the development of non-Hodgkin lymphomas]

SULYOK Mihály, MAKARA Mihály, ÚJHELYI Eszter, VÁLYI-NAGY István

[There is a growing body of evidence for the association between chronic hepatitis C virus infection and certain subtypes of Bcell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The development of a lymphoid malignancy is usually preceded by cryoglobulinaemia. Here, we summarise the most important epidemiologic data, and the possible molecular mechanisms of HCV-associated lymphomagenesis. The direct oncogenic effect of the virus has not been proven, but chronic antigenic stimulation maintained by replication and viral lymphotropism might both contribute to the development of lymphomas. It should be emphasised that elimination of the hepatitis C virus can halt this process in case of cryoglobulinaemia and low-grade malignity (usually marginal zone lymphomas). In these cases, antiviral therapy might be a useful alternative of conventional immune-chemotherapy. Thus, a collaboration between haematologists and hepatologists might be a great step forward in the treatment of these diseases. It is still not established whether interferon-based short-course therapies and interferon-free regimens are also effective in the treatment of associated lymphomas.]

Lege Artis Medicinae

[“War of numbers” and the facts about pegylated interferon based treatment of chronic hepatitis C]

MAKARA Mihály, HUNYADY Béla

[Further to the traditional pegylated interferon and ribavirin products, used since 2001 in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, two new direct antiviral protease inhibitors were licensed in 2011: telaprevir and boceprevir. Added to the traditional dual combination either of these drugs increase significantly the rate of sustained viral response. Discussions over the relative efficacy of two different bands of interferons with different pharmacokinetic properties as well as of the different protease inhibitors are arising regularly. After critical review of the relevant literature the authors did not identify any clinically meaningful differences in efficacy of the two pegylated interferons (α 2a or α 2b) neither in dual nor in triple combination therapies. There has been no convincing evidence found to support superiority of one protease inhibitor over the other, either: Generally both drugs can be recommended for patients previously or actually not responding to dual therapy. However, there is a tendency towards a potential difference between the relapse rates after treatments with the two pegylated interferons in dual therapy, attributable potentially to the difference of their pharmacokinetic profiles. In special cases the choice of protease inhibitors can be influenced by cost-effectiveness and side effect profile.]

Lege Artis Medicinae

[The treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon - Peginterferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b?]

TORNAI István

[The main purpose of the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C is to achieve a sustained virologic remission (SVR), which means that no hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) is detectable 24 weeks after the cessation of treatment. In patients infected by genotype 1 virus, the chance of achieving SVR by a combination treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin is about 40-50%. The pharmacokinetic properties of the two peginterferons are significantly different from each other. A number of clinical trials have been performed in the past eight years to clarify whether this difference influences the clinical efficiency or safety of these drugs. Several prospective, comparative studies have been completed recently. Among these, the American IDEAL study is the largest and most important one, however, the results of numberous smaller studies are also available. More than 3000 patients with genotype 1 HCV were treated in the IDEAL study and no significant difference was found in SVR rates between the peginterferon alfa-2a and alfa-2b treatment arms. However, the doses of ribavirin used in this study raise several questions in this study. In two smaller Italian studies, significantly higher SVR was achieved with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavarin treatment. According to a Cochrane metaanalysis, in which reviewed data of 4335 patients from eight randomized trails have been reviewed, treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a is significantly more effective. Besides efficiency, the cost/effectiveness of the two therapies were also compared in a large American study, which also showed that peginterferon alfa-2a treatment was superior to peginterferon alfa-2b treatment.]

Lege Artis Medicinae

[Treatment of hepatits C virus infected patients with cirrhosis in real-life conditions in Hungary with the two pegylated interferons]

[AIMS - In this trial we have analyzed the data of cirrhotic naiv as well as treatment experienced patients with chronic hepatitis C, treated in the East-Hungarian hepatology centers, between 2004 and 2010, because in the era of triple combinations, we mostly treat cirrhotic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS - We have found 272 patients and in most of them the cirrhosis was proven by biopsy. These patients were treated with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) alpha plus ribavirin in combination, 172 were naiv and 100 patients were treatment experienced. Data were collected retrospectively and the pretreatment parameters like age, sex, body weight, transaminase level, genotype, initial viral load, comorbidities, and proportion of first and repeated treatments have been analyzed. We have investigated the influence of the initial parameters as well as the type of pegIFN on the complete early virologic response (cEVR) and on the sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS - The cEVR was 27% (74/272) and the SVR was 21% (58/272) in the whole patient population. With pegIFN a-2a, 32% (45/141) cEVR and 28% (39/141) SVR, whereas with pegIFN a-2b 22% (29/131) cEVR and 15% (19/131) SVR were achieved. Among this patient population the largest subgroup was the naiv patients with high viral load (HVL). In this subgroup the SVR was 21% (28/132). However, with pegIFN a-2a SVR was 29% (21/73), whereas with pegIFN a-2b SVR was only 12% (7/59). The above differences found between the two pegIFNs proved to be statistically significant. Age <40 years, low viral load (LVL) and treatment with pegIFN a-2a proved to be independent positive factors influencing cEVR as well as SVR, by multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION - According to these results, cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C may benefit if pegIFN a-2a is used as backbone therapy in triple combinations. ]