Hypertension and nephrology

[Monitoring of the blood pressure lowering effectiveness of ramipril-amlodipine fix combination – a non-interventional trial (RAMONA study)]


JULY 20, 2013

Hypertension and nephrology - 2013;17(02)

[Purpose: Monitoring the effectiveness and safety of the fix combination formulation Egiramlon® therapy containing ramipril and amlodipin in patients, suffering from mild or moderate hypertension despite antihypertensive treatment. Patients and methods: Open, prospective, phase IV clinical observational study, which involved 9169 patients (age >18) with mild or moderate hypertension [TUKEB No: 16927- 1/2012/EKU (294/PI/12.)]. Ramipril/Amlodipin 5/5, 5/10, 10/5, 10/10 mg combinations were administered/ titrated in three visits, during the four months period according to the physician’s decision Blood pressure was measured by validated blood pressure sphygmomanometry and ABPM (Meditech, Hungary). The dosis of the fix combination formulation was determined individually during the visits by the 923 doctors involved in the study. The target blood pressure value was 140/90 mmHg, but in case of high risk patients population (diagnosed cardiovascular disease, diabetes), 130/90 mmHg target value was determined. Results: In 70.1% of the patients had no protocoll deviation. Patients data and examination results were processed according to this 6423 patient population. The average age of the patients were 60.2 year, in 50-50% sex distribution. The average duration of the treated hypertension was 9.8 years and the average blood pressure value was 157/91 mmHg. Till the end of the study, systolic blood pressure has decreased with 26.4 mmHg and diastolic pressure with 11.8 mmHg. An average 5.5 bpm heart rate frequency decreasing was observed at the end of the study. As a result of the treatment 52.4% of the patient population has reached the target blood pressure value.]



Further articles in this publication

Hypertension and nephrology

[Report on the 50th Jubilee Congress of the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association]

BÁNKI N. Fanni

Hypertension and nephrology

[Hypertension and diabetes mellitus]

SZEGEDI János, KISS István

[Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are endemics which affect large crowds; they play an important role in the morbidity and mortality of the population. Both diseases are cardiovascular risk factors, their co-occurrence increases the coronary risk. According to forecasts, there will be 60% increase in the number of hypertensive patients by 2025; it will affect 29% of the world’s adult population, 1.56 billion people. The number of patients with diabetes increases in all countries; 552 million diabetic patients should be expected by 2030. The simultaneous occurrence of both diseases may be a coincidence, but there is also causal relationship between the two diseases (diabetic nephropathy, metabolic syndrome). The two diseases often occur in endocrine diseases, and in connection with medicinal therapy (steroids, etc.). The simultaneous occurrence of these two diseases determines the therapeutic strategy. During the prevention and treatment of both diseases, the change in lifestyle has an important role (obesity, salt intake, physical activity).]

Hypertension and nephrology

[Practical aspects of therapy by erythropoiesis stimulating agents in renal anaemia]

DEÁK György, HERSZÉNYI Eszter, AMBRUS Csaba, KISS István

[Prevalence of renal anaemia due to insufficient production of erythropoietin increases progressively in the course of renal function deterioration. Renal anaemia is treated by erythropoesis stimulating agents (ESA). Outcomes of randomized clinical trials have taught us to avoid the strategy of normalization of hemoglobin (HGB) levels by ESA therapy as it may increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Anaemia published in 2012 recommends to start ESA therapy in the 90-100 g/l HGB range and suggests to keep HGB concentrations below 115 g/l. It is an inappropriate strategy to aim at normalizing hemoglobin (HGB) levels by ESA therapy because it may lead to progressive escalation of ESA doses even in the presence of diminished ESA responsiveness. High ESA doses and diseases causing ESA hyporesponsiveness eg. infections, chronic inflammation, malnutrition, insufficient dose of dialysis, severe hyperparathyroidism, iron deficiency are related to increased risk of mortality. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anaemia emphasizes the importance of assessing and treating causes of ESA hyporesponsiveness, limits ESA dose escalation and recommends gradually changing ESA doses to avoid high amplitude HGB oscillation.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[Managing hypertension using a fixed combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker]

E. Chazova, G. Ratova, V. Nedogoda, M. Lopatin, B. Perepech, V. Tsoma

[The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of a low-dose combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (lisinopril 10 mg) and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (amlodipine 5 mg) (Ekvator, Gedeon Richter) (Group 1) and enalapril with or without hydrochlorothiazide (Group 2) in hypertension. Materials and methods: The study included 93 patients with hypertension (36% of men and 64% of women). The mean age was 52.6±12 years and the mean duration of hypertension was 7.5±6.1 years. The initial office blood pressure (BP) was 149.2±13.8/91.4±81 mmHg. Patients were randomized into two groups (Group 1, n=51 and Group 2, n=36). Results: The fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/lisinopril offered the potential to reduce the office BP by -28.9±11.3/-16.0±8.7 mmHg; p<0.0001. In Group 2 the office BP dropped by -22.9±17.9/-11.5±10.7 mmHg; p<0.0001. Patients in Group 1 achieved goal blood pressure more frequently than patients in Group 2 (94.1% versus 72.2% patients respectively; p=0.008). There were no significant changes in the heart rate in either group. The reduction of microalbuminuria (the reduction in urinary albumin excretion (UAE)) by -13.8±24.4 mg/24h (p<0.001) was observed only in patients from Group 1. The quality of life of patients from Group 2 improved. However, the quality of life improvements were more significant in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p=0.002). Conclusion: The fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/lisinopril offers the potential to achieve a target blood pressure in 94% of patients with hypertension, produces a nephroprotective effect and improves patients’ quality of life.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[HYVET: A Milestone Drug Study – The Clinical Study of the Year in 2008]


All articles in the issue

Related contents

Hypertension and nephrology

[Association between cyclothymic affective temperament and hypertension]


[Affective temperaments (cyclothymic, hypertymic, depressive, anxious, irritable) are stable parts of personality and after adolescent only their minor changes are detectable. Their connections with psychopathology is well-described; depressive temperament plays role in major depression, cyclothymic temperament in bipolar II disorder, while hyperthymic temperament in bipolar I disorder. Moreover, scientific data of the last decade suggest, that affective temperaments are also associated with somatic diseases. Cyclothymic temperament is supposed to have the closest connection with hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension is higher parallel with the presence of dominant cyclothymic affective temperament and in this condition the frequency of cardiovascular complications in hypertensive patients was also described to be higher. In chronic hypertensive patients cyclothymic temperament score is positively associated with systolic blood pressure and in women with the earlier development of hypertension. The background of these associations is probably based on the more prevalent presence of common risk factors (smoking, obesity, alcoholism) with more pronounced cyclothymic temperament. The scientific importance of the research of the associations of personality traits including affective temperaments with somatic disorders can help in the identification of higher risk patient subgroups.]

Lege Artis Medicinae



[Early monitoring and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome takes place in coronary units. Hypertension is one of the main risk factors of the syndrome. Many patients have high blood pressure in the acute situation, and it may be further increased by the acute stress effect. To ensure controllability of blood pressure, intravenously administered nitroglycerine, beta receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and centrally acting drugs are the medications of choice in the management of acute coronary syndrome.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[Hypertension and Covid-19 – Part I. Significance of age, underlying diseases, and ACEI/ARB therapy in hypertension and co-morbidities during SARS-Cov2 infection]


[The appearance of the Covid-19 epidemic in different continents shows specific clinical features. Confirmed infected patients are detectable from approximately 30 years, with a maximum between 40 and 70 years of age. At the same time, however, a significant proportion of those who die from the infection come from patients over 65 years. The prevalence and mortality rates of the hypertensive population show a very similar formation. Based on the data collected, it is not surprising that hypertension as the underlying disease in the Covid- 19 epidemic is the first in all analysis. A more precise analysis clarified that it is not hypertension per se, but co-morbidities and complications of hypertension that play a primary role behind large-scale mortality in old age, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Data from China, North America, and Italy suggest that hypertension and diabetes – and in North America, pathological obesity – in infected patients actually only reflect the prevalence of these diseases in a given population. The presence of comorbidities (coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease) – based on multivariate logistic regression analysis – presents a more risk for severe clinical course and mortality. Some recent analyses have provided strong evidence that ACEI/ARB treatment does not pose a higher risk for the course or outcome of infection. Their administration is constantly needed in hypertension and comorbidities due to their organ protective and slowing the progression of diseases.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[The importance of health-centered approach in the management of hypertensive patients]


[In the everyday clinical practice the main objectives are the accurate establishment of the diagnosis and evidence based treatment of diagnosed disease. Besides the accustomed, rigorously medical, simplifying aspect, the bio-psycho- social approach is gaining an increasing importance. The objective of the article is, taking modern definition of health into account, emphasizing the importance of a new approach in the complex management of patients, having primary hypertension, a disease, impairing not only target organs, as well as the whole person, seriously influencing the health status of the affected person. In the management of a hypertensive patient, besides decreasing blood pressure, preventing and treating target organ complications and coexisting diseases, we should assess the whole person impairment, the effects of environmental and personal factors, and their influence on activities of daily living and participation in the life of the society, consequently, the changes in health status. This complex approach permits alone the more complete restoration of health of an affected person.]


[Vitamin D treatment: hormone therapy for patients who need it or simply a supplementation for everyone?]


[Various medical associations issue different recommendations for the prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency. These significant differences are partly explained by the different definition of normal vitamin D level and the use of completely different mathematical models to predict the increase in vitamin D level as a response to therapy. According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), the target vitamin D level is 20 ng/ml, whereas the Endocrine Society (ES) recommends 30 ng/m as the miminum target value. According to the ES, a 1 ng/ml increase of vitamin D level can be reached by a daily intake of 100 NE, while the IOM recommends 3.6 ng/ml. Moreover, the IOM states that the effect of therapy on serum level is nonlinear. These differences show that the ES and IOM have different views on the risk of adverse effects. The IOM recommends 400 IU vitamin D daily for children younger than 1 year, 800 IU for those above 70 years and 600 IU/per day for everyone else. The ES recommend 400-1000 IU daily for all infants and 1500- 2000 IU for adults. Screening, however, is not recommended by either society. To decrease uncertainty concerning the side effects of higher-dose vitamin D treatment, it is important to understand, use and support the function of the pharmacovigilance system of the pharmaceutical industry that manufactures and markets various (prescription, over-the-counter) preparations. This is what the author aims to highlight in the second part of this article. Using this system, both the doctor and the patient can help support and accept the justification of higher-dose vitamin D therapy.]