Hypertension and nephrology

[Results of ATTENTION study]


APRIL 20, 2018

Hypertension and nephrology - 2018;22(02)

[In the ATTENTION (Using of ARB and sTaTin basEd iNdividualized Treatments in Hungarian patients In the light Of New CV prevention guidelines) trial’s ARB arm 9996 treated hypertensive patients were enrolled. Based on the results in the medical practice, the choice of the first ARB has a significant impact on the further antihypertensive therapy. Losartan, telmisartan and valsartan are all suitable for reaching the goal blood pressure. If necessary, doctors will not change the composition but the dose or use a diuretic supplement (resistant hypertension, older age etc.). Overall a telmisartan preference was observed in the study.]



Further articles in this publication

Hypertension and nephrology

[Role of β-blockers, especially carvedilol in the treatment of hypertension]

PÁLL Dénes, MARODA László, ZRÍNYI Miklós

[Changes in hypertension guidelines in the past years have affected the clinical thinking about β-blockers. Authors reviewed the development of β-blockers emphasizing the differences across various active pharmaceutical agents. Different hemodynamic and metabolic effects are being discussed in details for the third ge - neration vasodilatator carvedilol. Carvedilol has no effect on cardiac output but decreases peripheral vascular resistance which results in lower blood pressure values. However, carvedilol, opposite to unfavorable effects of traditional β-blockers, has a neutral impact on both carbohydrate and lipid metabolisms. Its more advanced cardiac effects include decreased left ventricular hypertrophy and increased coronary flow reserve. Vasodilatator type β-blockers (carvedilol, nebivolol) are indicated in the combi - nation treatment of hypertension, especially when the patient has heart failure, coronary disease or suffered from a previous heart attack.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[A Letter to Our Readers]

KÉKES Ede, KISS István

Hypertension and nephrology

[Alberto Zanchetti]

FARSANG Csaba, JÁRAI Zoltán, KÉKES Ede, KISS István

Hypertension and nephrology

[Cholesterol-lowering is not the Holy Grail, but neither is the work of the devil]


[Cholesterol-lowering statins are the most tested medications in respect of the effects and side-effects. Based on these, we can safely claim that most of the negative opinions about cholesterol-lowering are not realistic. It is not a panacea, but it is proven that around a 30% of cardio- and cerebrovascular risk reducation can be achieved by their regular taking, while the incidence of side effects and risks are at least one order of magnitude lower in each patient groups. For cholesterol, there is no “normal” lab threshold or low level, only “target values”, since the mean value in the general population is high in regard of atherosclerosis (the values measured at birth and among natural people can be considered normal). Let us appreciate the cholesterol- lowering medications because we do not have a large armamentarium!]

Hypertension and nephrology

[The Editors Ask, the Expert Responds]


All articles in the issue

Related contents

Hypertension and nephrology

[Cardiovascular prevention in hypertensive patients - use an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker?]

BARNA István

[The primary aim of cardiovascular prevention is to reach adequate blood pressure control. To prevent the development of target organ lesion it is essential to use long-acting, well tolerable drugs without significant side effects. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are popular and excellent preparations but their side effects reduce life long patient compliance. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are effective drugs having unique tolerability and a capability to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality to the same extent as the ACE inhibitors. Especially high risk patients benefit from their combination with thiazide diuretics or with calcium channel blockers. Clinical trials proved that telmisartan can be safely given and well tolerable alone or in combination to high risk cardiovascular patients, in heart and renal, peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular diseases combined or not with diabetes.]

Hypertension and nephrology

[ACEi or ARB? What are the results of the comparative analysis?]


[Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are treatment options for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or those with cardiovascular risk factors. The comparative efficacy and safety of ACEis and ARBs have been much debated. To compare the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients without heart failure a metaanalysis was carried out based on 254.301 subjects of 106 randomised trials. Meta-analysis included randomized trials of ACEis and ARBs compared with placebo or active controls and corroborated with head-to-head trials of ARBs vs ACEis. According to placebo controlled studies ACEis but not ARBs reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MI. It seems that ACEis are more effective than ARBs. But this is only true if we take into account the trials before 2000. The analysis restricted to trials published after 2000 revealed similar outcomes with ACEis vs placebo and ARBs vs placebo. Head-to-head comparison trials of ARBs vs ACEis exhibited no difference in outcomes. The underlying causes and details are explained in this review.]

Lege Artis Medicinae

[A new fix combination therapy in effective cardiovascular prevention]

NAGY András Csaba

[A large amount of literature is available one modern antihypertensive therapy. The experiences of the past 10-20 years have changed clinical practice in many areas of medication and of prevention of complications. Therapy has been revolutionised not only by the new and newer agents but also by the introduction of combined therapy. In this paper, we discuss the use of a new fix-combination antihypertensive drug, with two components (telmisartan and amlodipine) about which excellent evidence is available. We highlight the advantages of this combination therapy in cardiovascular prevention, which is partly explained by better patient compliance due to its favourable side-effect profile.]